Which scenario constitutes false imprisonment?

The scenario that constitutes false imprisonment is one where a person is restrained without their consent and without legal justification. False imprisonment occurs when an individual is confined or restricted in their freedom of movement without lawful authority. This means that for an act to qualify as false imprisonment, it must lack the person’s agreement and should not be based on any legal grounds.

In contrast, detaining someone for their safety with their consent is not false imprisonment because it involves the individual’s agreement to the restriction of their freedom. Apprehending a suspect with a valid warrant is also not considered false imprisonment, as there is legal justification for the detention provided by the warrant. Similarly, holding a person temporarily in a safe location during an emergency does not equate to false imprisonment if it is done with good intentions, particularly for the individual's protection, especially when they may agree or if there is an implied legal or moral duty to protect them.